Argumentative Essay Anti-Gun Control

Argument Against Gun Control

An Argument Against Gun Control As long ago as 1789, the creators of the

Constitution realized the importance of guns in American society. The Second

Amendment states,"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security

of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be

infringed." No loopholes, or legal caches exist in this statement. The Founding

Fathers allow for no restriction of the private ownership of firearms. Yet, in

recent years anti-gun politicians have attempted to control guns in the name of

crime prevention. Gun control makes no effort to control criminals, does not

reduce crime, takes guns from responsible sportsmen and recreational

shooters, and allows criminals to possess firearms superior to those of the

public. Advocates that support the cause of control claim that controlling

firearms will lesson criminal action. Gun control does nothing to control

criminals. The fundamental flaw in the thinking of anti-gun polititions is that

guns don't kill people. People kill people. The same logic that leads one to

control firearms could also lead one to endeavor to control automobiles and

fast food simply because they are instrumental in millions of deaths per year.

Why when Americans reject such an absurd theory as "Automobile Control,"

which do not infringe the constitution,. would these same individuals embrace

an idea as gun control? People accept gun control, but if a politician would

suggest "controlling" fast food restaurants because the fatty food causes heart

problems and deaths, the public would scorn his insane proposal. Ultimately,

people's choices lead them to drive recklessly, overindulge in unhealthy food,

and use firearms to commit violent crimes. So, criminals should be controlled,

not the guns which they share with millions of law-abiding citizens. Gun

control supporters claim that gun control lowers crime rate. Gun control does

nothing to reduce crime. A study conducted by the Urban Institute regarding

The Clinton Gun Ban Law of 1995, finds that "because the banned guns and

magazines were never used in more than a fraction of all gun murders, even

the maximum theoretically achievable preventive effect of the ban on gun

murders is almost certainly too small to detect statistically..." Joseph

Constance, the Deputy Police Chief of Trenton, New Jersey, states: "Assault

weapons are used in an underwhelming .026 of 1% of crimes in New Jersey.

This means that my officers are more likely to confront an escaped tiger from

the local zoo, than to confront an assault rifle in the hands of a drug-crazed

killer on the streets." West Virginia stands as an example of the inaccurate

thinking of gun control advocates. This state has the highest number of guns

per person in the nation, yet it has the lowest number of crimes per person in

the nation. Gun control has little or no effect on crime. Gun control advocates

believe that gun control has no effect on the law-abiding citizens.However,

gun control takes recreational firearms from law-abiding citizens. Many of the

guns used today for hunting and recreational shooting originate as military

weapons (e.g., 6.5 x 55 Mauser, 8mm Mauser, and 7mm Remington). Gun

control advocates like to make statements such as this one from a New York

Times editorial: "No Federal law limits military assault rifles that are

semi-automatic." They overlook the fact that military rifles are not

semi-automatic they are automatics. The guns which gun controll advocates

seek to regulate conform to statutes that keep the public from owning

military, fully-automatic weapons. Average Americans responsibly shoot

these completely legal semi-automatic guns for recreation. Gun control takes

firearms from hobbyists and hunters. Finally, limiting the right of a citizen to

own certain guns puts him at a disadvantage when dealing with criminals and

protecting his family. If a criminal needs a gun, he purchases it on the street,

and can acquire whatever type of firearm he chooses. Yet, when a

law-abiding citizen wishes to procure a gun, he must choose from those

which the government deems fit. So, when the criminal breaks into the

citizen's home or business, bearing any type of firearm he chooses, the citizen

must defend himself, his belongings, and his loved ones, with an inferior, legal

firearm. In this scenario, gun control serves to give a criminal an advantage

over a law-abiding, armed citizen. In conclusion, no substantial reason for gun

control exists. It fails to control criminals and crime, while taking guns from

law-abiding Americans who use them for defense and recreation. The time is

at hand for Americans to stand and defend their Second Amendment rights,

and make liberal, anti-gun politicians aware that gun control has no place in

society.

Word Count: 777

Argument Against Gun Control

  • Length: 1277 words (3.6 double-spaced pages)
  • Rating: Excellent
Open Document

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - More ↓

Gun Control is when you keep firearms plus guns away from people. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Also when ever people hear the word gun, the thoughts are of violence and negativity. Many people, myself included think gun control is wrong because we know that it is not necessary, since we know that guns were not involved in many of the deaths caused each year. While many other people disagree and think it is good because of the safety for people. In this essay I will tell you why gun control is unnecessary and why there shouldn?t be any gun control at all.

There have been many gun control laws established throughout the U.S., but they vary from state to state. For example, in Colorado you can purchase any type of gun: handgun, machine gun, shotgun, rifle, automatic rifle, etc. at the age of 18, while in other places you would need a hunting license.1 I think this is unfair because when I?m at the age of 18 I would want to buy a gun, but I can?t because I?m living in California and another 18 year old could in Colorado. Also, another example is that in some states, they allow citizens to carry concealed weapons, while in other states citizens can?t. I don?t think this is fair at all because I think they should make laws that suits the whole U.S., and not make different laws in different states. Another reason that makes me think that they shouldn?t have different gun control laws in different places is because I knew a person that buys guns in New York, and some how got them over here and sells them to people by tripling the price. I have asked him how he got them over here, but he never told me how he did it. He told me that he has done this for many years until one time he got caught when he was selling them and was jailed for 6 or 7 months. If gun control laws were applied the same in every place he could of never have gotten the guns. This also means that criminals could have done the same thing that my friend had done, but not sell the guns but use them to do bad things.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"Argument Against Gun Control." 123HelpMe.com. 10 Mar 2018
    <http://www.123HelpMe.com/view.asp?id=133389>.

LengthColor Rating 
An Argument Against Gun Control Essay - Argument Against Gun Control An Argument Against Gun Control As long ago as 1789, the creators of the Constitution realized the importance of guns in American society. The Second Amendment states,"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." No loopholes, or legal caches exist in this statement. The Founding Fathers allow for no restriction of the private ownership of firearms....   [tags: Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms]774 words
(2.2 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
An Argument Against Gun Control Essay - A proposed federal law to outlaw all guns would be more effective at disarming law-abiding citizens than at disarming the criminals who abuse them. If guns were outlawed, the criminals would not stop carrying guns, but the good, law-abiding citizens would. It would do nothing about the illegally obtained handguns in the possession of criminals. In The NRA is Right, Josh Sugarmann states that “One tenet of the National Rifle Association’s faith has always been that handgun controls do little to stop criminals from obtaining handguns” (Sugarmann 185)....   [tags: Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms]900 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
An Argument Against Gun Control Essay - The Gun Control issue has sparked major controversy in America today. People who support gun control feel that guns are the reason for the soaring crime rate in our country. I disagree with the supporters of gun control. I feel that because of the black market, violent criminals being released from prison early, and the need to ensure personal safety, stricter gun control will have very little impact on violent crime in America. I believe that gun control works in theory, but not in real life. Sure, there are many violent crimes where guns are used, but most of these guns are obtained illegally, because the gun control laws enforced are not enough....   [tags: Firearms Brady Bill]
:: 8 Works Cited
1758 words
(5 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Argument Against Gun Control Essay - Gun Control is when you keep firearms plus guns away from people. Many people think that gun control is right because they think keeping people away from guns will reduce the amount of deaths each year. They also think that guns cause many of the deaths that had been committed each year. Also when ever people hear the word gun, the thoughts are of violence and negativity. Many people, myself included think gun control is wrong because we know that it is not necessary, since we know that guns were not involved in many of the deaths caused each year....   [tags: Second Amendment The Right To Bear Arms]1277 words
(3.6 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
America Needs Stricter Gun Control Laws Essay - On November 22, 1963, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, by a man named Lee Harvey Oswald. Kennedy’s assassination sent shockwaves through the United States, which initiated the heated debate of gun control, and is continued today due to horrific mass shootings. Perhaps the most frequently used argument by people who are against gun control is the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. Pro-gun enthusiasts claim that gun control is in direct violation of this Amendment....   [tags: Gun Control Essays]
:: 6 Works Cited
917 words
(2.6 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Essay on An Argument for Gun Control - America is the most well armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning about 270 million of the world’s 875 million firearms (Marshall). Indeed, this is more than a quarter of the world’s registered firearms. The reason why Americans own so many guns is because of the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Rauch) This amendment guarantees U.S. citizens the right to have firearms....   [tags: Gun Control Essays]
:: 14 Works Cited
2438 words
(7 pages)
Research Papers[preview]
The Battle Between Gun Control and Gun Rights Essay - The debate over the right to bear arms according to the Second Amendment has been a hotly contested issue for many years in American history. The matter has been one of the most controversial issues in the second half of the twentieth century and into the twenty-first; disputed between politicians on the liberal and conservative side along with issues such as abortion, capital punishment, and gay marriage. The Supreme Court has officially defined the controversial Second Amendment by stating that states have the right to maintain a militia separate from a federally controlled army (Gale Encyclopedia, pg....   [tags: Gun Control Essays]
:: 6 Works Cited
1116 words
(3.2 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
Essay about Gun Control Laws Will NOT Reduce Crime - Gun control laws aim to restrict or regulate firearms by selecting who can sell, buy and possess certain guns. Criminals do not obey laws and stricter gun control laws or banning guns will have little effect on reducing crimes. There are many myths about gun control reducing acts of gun violence, which are simply not true according to research. People are responsible for the crimes, not the guns themselves. Taking guns away from United States citizens that use them for many reasons, shooting practice, competition, hunting and self-defense, should not be punished for the acts of criminals....   [tags: Gun Control Essays]
:: 11 Works Cited
1327 words
(3.8 pages)
Strong Essays[preview]
America Does Not Need Gun Control Essay - Gun control is often considered as an effective means of protecting ordinary citizens. We all want to feel safe, and it's easy to ascribe notions of safety to the idea of gun control. Unfortunately, feeling safe and actually being safe can be very different things. Gun control sounds wonderful in theory: no guns means no shootings. If only it were that simple. When one considers some of the worst shootings and gun-related crimes in recent history, it's peculiar to realize how often these occurred in places where guns were illegal to carry or even own....   [tags: argumentative, persuasive, gun control]
:: 5 Works Cited
1312 words
(3.7 pages)
Better Essays[preview]
Gun Control Essay - Firearms are dangerous weapons used to intentionally and unintentionally kill people, which lead to one of America�s most heated debates: gun control. With increasing crime and violence, many people look to gun control laws as a way to slow these trends down. On the other hand, others believe that owning a gun is a constitutional right that should never be taken away. James Q. Wilson�s essay �Just Take Away Their Guns� is an attempt to offer a solution to both sides of this argument. He claims that illegal possession of firearms is the problem and that frisking suspicious characters would be a good solution to the debate of gun control....   [tags: Gun Control, 2015]
:: 3 Works Cited
1142 words
(3.3 pages)
Better Essays[preview]



Another reason why different laws on different states are bad is that tourists don?t know the gun laws in that area and they would probably think it is the same as the state that they live in. They would be in big trouble if they did anything related to guns. So I think that if the government would want to make laws about gun control the laws should be the same everywhere and not have different laws in different places.

There should not be gun control because there are law-abiding citizens that would not commit murder, robbery, or domestic violence. Only guns in hands of people that have been arrested and have a record of violence actives cause murder, robbery and domestic violence the most. There should be criminal control and not gun controls because it would be more useful. In the year 1996 the U.S. Justice Department estimated there were more than 665,000 gang members and 310,000, almost half, of these gang members have guns although gun control laws have already been established in most parts of the U.S.2 There should not be gun control because even though there is gun control criminals could still have ways of getting guns in the black market where people make guns and sell them illegally. Many people buy guns for protection and self-defense because in1856 the Supreme Court said, ?Courts have ruled that the government does not have a specific duty to protect individuals.? 3 In the U.S. there are about 10 million violent crimes committed each year, and about 3.9 million times victims use guns for self-defense. So guns in the hands of good people are used for self-defense. There should be criminal control and not gun control because criminals can some how get guns illegally while people who are not criminals can?t. It would be bad for criminals to have guns and us to not have guns to protect ourselves against them. So I think there should be no gun control and everyone could own a gun for self-defense.

Many people think teenagers with guns are very dangerous because they are small and immature and probably would run around killing people with a gun. I agree that teenagers are very curious about guns and think they are toys, but they don?t kill much people with guns. According to the study by the U.S. Department of Justice?s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, teenagers who get guns from their parents don?t commit gun crimes at all; while teenagers who get guns illegally do commit crimes about 21% of the time.4 Many of the teenagers are being killed each year by guns, but not by juveniles; 90% of children under the age 12 or under being murdered and 70% of the aged 12-17 are being killed by adults out of the 2000-3000 children gun victims each year.5 Teenagers are primarily killed by gun accidents and gun accidents are increasing, but more teenagers die from accidental drowning and burns than from gun deaths (Please see accident chart in the back G.1) As I said before teenagers that have guns don?t kill many people. For example, about 186,000 teenagers carry guns to school for protection and self-defense, but less than 1% of all homicides among school children age 5-19 years old occur in school grounds or on the way to or from school.6 Also studies estimate that death at school is about 20-30 children each year which is 1/10 of the children murdered each year by parents or caretakers. So teenagers having guns and bringing guns to school is not so bad. So it is not necessary to have gun control for children sense they don?t do any bad things with guns and all they uses guns for is protection and self-defense.

Throughout the world the U.S. is the leader the world in gun deaths, with about 34,000 gun deaths in the U.S. in 1996.7 Many of the gun deaths are suicides and accidents and leaves out of a few being homicides. According to the FBI estimate the homicide rate is beginning to fall from 7.0 to 6.2 per 10,000 in 1998.8 This tells us that not many gun deaths are homicides. (Please see gun death rate chart on last page G.2). So as I said before gun control is not necessary because suicides can be done in different ways, if there were no guns people can use some other weapons or ways to commit suicide. Accident can be prevented if gun makers make the guns more difficult to fire and have more safety functions. So the only major issue left is homicide, which does not account for many of the gun deaths, and which is now decreasing.

Even though guns cause many deaths, they also save many lives too. Guns saved about 3.9 million peoples lives each year by self-defense. Only guns in the hands of criminals are bad and guns in the hands of regular people are for protection. So I think that everyone has the right to own a gun for their own protection and there should be no gun control laws.



0 Thoughts to “Argumentative Essay Anti-Gun Control

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *